Analytical hydrodynamics, as it is understood here, means the investigation of fluid flows using tools from topology and differential geometry. These tools enable us to describe properties and conservation laws of fluid flows that may be important for computational fluid dynamics, especially for climate models. Climate models need to solve the Navier-Stokes equations for the atmosphere and the oceans, they need to use discrete approximation schemes for this task. Such schemes can cause artefacts like the violation of conservation laws of the partial differential equations that they approximate. This phenomenon poses a huge problem for long running models like climate models.
A climate model that violates the conservation of energy, for example, cannot be used to predict an average temperature (or, quite possible, to predict anything about the climate at all). Some currently used climate model suffer from these insufficiencies. Necessary corrections have to be added manually and heuristically and are commonly called “flow corrections”. It is a part of ongoing research to remove these kinds of corrections from climate models.
The flow of an ideal fluid, that is an incompressible, inviscid and homogenuous fluid, filling a certain domain, is from the mathematical viewpoint described by a geodesic on the group of diffeomorphisms of that domain that preserve volume elements. The geodesics are the geodesics of the Riemannian metric given by the kinetic energy.
We’ll make all of this precise in the following:
As domain we take a compact Riemannian manifold . The diffeomorphisms of form an infinite dimensional group . is a Fréchet manifold, so that some concepts from finite dimensional differential geometry may be defined on it.
For ideal fluids we’ll actually look at the subgroup of diffeomorphisms that conserve a given volume form on :
is clearly a subgroup, it is also a closed subgroup and therefore a Lie group.
The (infinite dimensional) Lie algebra of is the vector space of all vector fields on with zero divergence.
Let M be a smooth orientable Riemannian manifold of dimension n. A volume form is a n-form that vanishes nowhere. In with cartesian coordinates the canonical example would be
The dual basis of etc. is denoted by etc. in our example.
The divergence of a vector field with respect to a volume form is the unique scalar function such that:
When we use our example we’d write of course
and the divergence of X would be
which we get if we plug in the expression for into the formula .
Given two manifolds and a differentiable map , we can pull back a differential form on to one on via
On a Riemannian manifold with tangential bundle there is a unique connection, the Levi-Civita connection, with the following properties for vector fields :
If we combine both formulas we get
If the scalar products are constant along every flow, i.e. the metric is invariant, then the first three terms on the right hand side vanish, so that we get
This latter formula can be written in a more succinct way if we introduce the coadjoint operator. Remeber the adjoint operator defined to be
With the help of the scalar product we may define
Then the formula above for the covariant derivative can be written as
Since the inner product is nondegenerate, eliminating leads to
A geodesic curve is one whose tangent vector is transported parallel to itself, that is we have
Using the formula for the covariant derivative for an invariant metric above we get
as a reformulation of the geodesic equation. For time dependent dynamical systems, we have the time axis as an additional dimension and every vector field has as an additional summand. So, in this case we get as geodesic equation (again: for an invariant metric)
The Euler viewpoint of fluids is that there are fluid packages or “particles”. The fluid flow is described by specifying where each package or particle is at a given time t. When we start with a time on a given manifold , the flow of every fluid package is decribed by a path on parameterized by time, and for every time there is a diffeomorphism of defined by the requirement that it maps the initial position of every fluid package to the position at time .
To be continued…
We can turn the linear space of divergence free vector fields into a Lie algebra by giving it the negative Jacobi-Lie bracket:
TODO: explain why it is the negative of the usual definition (left Lie algebra bracket).
We also have a scalar product on :
Remember from last time that one can define the directional derivative on Fréchet spaces just like in finite dimensions:
Let and be Fréchet spaces, open and a continuous map. The derivative of at the point in the direction is the map
For a real valued function of , the derivative eats two vector fields and spits out a real number. If you have a derivative and a fixed vector field , you can determine for every vector field another vector field by requiring that
holds. I used the funny ‘s to match the notation of
We can now define the ideal fluid bracket which plays the role of the Lie-Poisson bracket for real valued functions of :
We choose as energy function, the Hamiltonian , simply the kinetic energy:
Then we can show that
for all functions is equivalent to Euler’s equation.
V.I. Arnold, ; B.A. Khesin: Topological methods in hydrodynamics. (Springer 1998, ZMATH)
Boris Khesin, Robert Wendt: The geometry of infinite-dimensional groups. (Springer 2009, ZMATH)
Tsutomu Kambe: Geometrical theory of dynamical systems and fluid flows. Revised ed. (ZMATH)
A paper dedicated to the Burgers equation: